The Validity and Reliability of the MacNew Heart Disease Health Related Quality of Life Questionnaire: The Indonesian Version

Nur Basuki, Doa El-Ansary, Stefan Höfer, Bambang Dwiputra, Nantinee Nualnim

Abstract


Background: The MacNew heart disease health related quality of life tool is used widely in the cardiac populations to evaluate the impact of disease and intervention including rehabilitation. In addition to the English version, it is also available for several other languages except the Indonesian language. Therefore, the purpose of this study were 1) to translate the MacNew questionnaire from the English version to the Indonesian language and 2) to estimate the preliminary validity and reliability of the Indonesian MacNew for patients with coronary artery disease. Methods: Forward and backward translation procedure was used to develop the Indonesian MacNew. The Indonesian MacNew was administered to 24 patients after one week of revascularization surgery. Reliability was assessed by internal consistency and test-retest reliability. To evaluate concurrent validity, the correlation of the compatible domain of the Indonesian MacNew and SF-36 was assessed. Results: Internal consistency reliability of the Indonesian MacNew was confirmed with Cronbach’s α of the global scale and all three subscales exceeding 0.95. Test- retest reliability was acceptable with intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.66 for the global score. Furthermore, an acceptable concurrent validity was established with statistically significant correlation between Indonesian MacNew and SF-36 (pearson correlation ranging from 0.47 to 0.71). Conclusion: The first results of the Indonesian MacNew indicate acceptable validity and reliability as a measurement tool to assess health related quality of life of Indonesian patients with coronary artery disease.

Keywords


Quality of life; validity; reliability; Indonesian MacNew; coronary artery disease

References


Höfer S, Lim L, Guyatt G, et al. The MacNew heart disease health-related quality of life instrument: A summary. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2004;2(1):3.

Chen T-H, Li L, Kochen MM. A systematic review: how to choose appropriate health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measures in routine general practice? J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2005;6(9):936-40.

Karimi M, Brazier J. Health, health-related quality of life, and quality of life: What is the difference? Pharmaco Economics. 2016;34(7):645-9.

Salim S, Yamin M, Alwi I, et al. Validity and reliability of the Indonesian version of SF-36 quality of life questionnaire on patients with permanent pacemakers. Acta Med Indones. 2017;49(1):10-6.

Spertus JA, Winder JA, Dewhurst TA, et al. Development and evaluation of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire: A new functional status measure for coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25.

Kimble LP, Dunbar SB, Weintraub WS, et al. The Seattle angina questionnaire: reliability and validity in women with chronic stable angina. Heart Disease (Hagerstown, Md). 2002;4(4):206-11.

Heo S, Moser DK, Riegel B, et al. Testing the psychometric properties of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire. Nursing Res. 2005;54(4):265-72.

Munyombwe T, Hofer S, Fitzsimons D, et al. An evaluation of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire using Rasch analysis. Qual Life Res. 2014;23(6):1753-65.

Höfer S, Saleem A, Stone J, et al. The MacNew heart disease health-related quality of life questionnaire in patients with angina and patients with ischemic heart failure. Value in Health. 2012;15(1):143-50.

Cicchetti DV. Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment. 1994;6(4):284-90.

Pallant J. SPSS survival manual: a step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for windows (Version 10). Buckingham: Open University Press; 2001.

Valenti L, Lim L, Heller RF. An improved questionnaire for assessing quality of life after myocardial infarction. Qual Life Res. 1996;5.

Lee WL, Chinna K, Bulgiba A, et al. Test-retest reliability of HeartQoL and its comparability to the MacNew heart disease health-related quality of life questionnaire. Qual Life Res. 2016;25(2):351-7.

Asadi-Lari M, Javadi HR, Melville M, et al. Adaptation of the MacNew quality of life questionnaire after myocardial infarction in an Iranian population. Health and quality of life outcomes. 2003;1:23-6.

Wang W, Lau Y, Palham S, et al. Psychometric testing of the Chinese Mandarin version of the MacNew Heart Disease Health-related Quality of Life questionnaire for patients with myocardial infarction in mainland China. Int J Nursing Pract. 2015;21(2):147-55.

Seneviwickrama KL, Samaranayake DB, Fonseka P, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the Sinhalese version of MacNew heart disease health related quality of life questionnaire in patients with stable angina. Health and quality of life outcomes. 2016;14:1-9.

Fattirolli F, Marchionni N, Hofer S, et al. The Italian MacNew heart disease health-related quality of life questionnaire: a validation study. Intern Emerg Med. 2015;10(3):359-68.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.