Peer-Review Process

Our journal uses the standard reviewing process from OJS to manage the review process. The Standard Review Process has its steps reviewers through the process, ensures a complete review history for each submission, and takes advantage of automatic reminder notifications and standard recommendations for submissions (Accept, Accept with revisions; Submit for review; Submit elsewhere; Decline; See comments).

The submitted manuscript is first reviewed by an editor. It will be evaluated in the office whether it is suitable for our focus and scope or has major methodological flaws. Every submitted manuscript that passes this step will be checked to identify any plagiarism before being reviewed by reviewers. One of the reviewers is appointed from other institutions (national or international). This journal uses double-blind review, The manuscript will be sent to the reviewer anonymously. Reviewers' comments are also sent anonymously to the corresponding author to take the necessary actions and responses. The decision on the revised manuscript will then be evaluated in an editorial board meeting, the final decision of whom are sent to the corresponding author.

Editors will email selected Reviewers the title and abstract of the submission, as well as an invitation to log into the journal website to complete the review. Reviewers enter the journal website to agree to do the review, to download submissions, submit their comments, and select a recommendation.