Predictors of Technical and Clinical Success of ERCP in Patients with Biliary Obstruction: A Study from a Tertiary Referral Center in Indonesia
Keywords:
billiary obstruction, ERCP, technical success, clinical success, predictive factorsAbstract
Background: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a primary therapeutic modality for managing malignant and benign biliary obstruction. Technical success (TS) and clinical success (CS) of modality are essential indicators of procedural efficacy, which is influenced by various patient- and procedure-related factors. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the TS and CS rates of ERCP and identify their predictors in patients with biliary obstruction at a tertiary referral center in Indonesia. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with biliary obstruction who underwent therapeutic ERCP at Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital between January 2022 and December 2024. Patients with diagnostic ERCP or prehepatic/parenchymal jaundice were excluded. Results: A total of 259 patients were included (49.4% female, mean age 50.6 years) in this study. The results show that the TS rate is 96.5%, with multivariate analysis identifying ulcerative fragile papillary mass (AOR 0.075; P=0.001) as an independent negative predictor. Meanwhile, the CS rate is 88%, with pre-ERCP bilirubin >3 mg/dL (AOR 8.545; P<0.001) and previous ERCP stenting/pre-cutting (AOR 0.330; P=0.037) being independent predictors. Distal malignant obstruction causes a higher pre-ERCP bilirubin level (P=0.025) of >3 mg/dL (OR 6.116; P=0.011). Conclusion: ERCP showed high technical and clinical success rates in managing biliary obstructions. TS was negatively predicted by ulcerative fragile papillary mass. CS was positively predicted by pre-ERCP bilirubin >3 mg/dL and negatively by prior stenting or pre-cutting. These findings should be taken into consideration when planning and delivering ERCP to achieve better outcomes.References
Coucke EM, Akbar H, Kahloon A, Lopez PP. Biliary Obstruction [Internet]. StatPearls.2025.
Sugiharto S, Budianto A, Siswardana DR, Sulistyo H. Penyakit-penyakit pada kantong empedu dan salurannya. 1st ed. In: Sugiharto S, Pratama AJ, editors. Malang: Litnus; 2024.
Yusmaidi, Rafie R, Permatasari A. Karakteristik pasien ikterus obstruktif et causa batu saluran empedu. J Ilm Kesehat Sandi Husada. 2020;11(1):328–4563.
Pu LZCT, Singh R, Loong CK, De Moura EGH. Malignant biliary obstruction: Evidence for best practice. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2016;2016.
Chandrasekhara V, Khashab MA, Muthusamy VR, et al. Adverse events associated with ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc [Internet]. 2017;85(1):32–47.
Demir T, Ustaoglu M. Evaluation of the success and complication rates of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography according to the difficulty of the procedure. Precis Med Sci. 2023;12(1):4–9.
Rizqiansyah CY, Awatara PID, Amar N, Lesmana CRA, Mustika S. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) hepaticogastrostomy (HGS) versus choledochoduodenostomy (CDS) in ERCP-failed malignant biliary obstruction: A systematic review and META-analysis. JGH Open. 2024;8(10):1–9.
Pausawasdi N, Termsinsuk P, Charatcharoenwitthaya P, Limsrivilai J, Kaosombatwattana U. Development and validation of a risk score for predicting clinical success after endobiliary stenting for malignant biliary obstruction. PLoS One [Internet]. 2022;17(8 August):1–15.
Jaroensri C, Eurboonyanun C, Titapun A, Srisuk T, Eurboonyanun K, Ruangwannasak S. Predicting factors for clinical success of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with biliary drainage in unresectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Diagnostic Interv Endosc. 2023;2(3):75–9.
Mohamed R, Lethebe BC, Gonzalez-Moreno E, et al. Morphology of the major papilla predicts ERCP procedural outcomes and adverse events. Surg Endosc. 2022;35(12):6455–65.
Tari E, Gagyi EB, Rancz A, et al. Morphology of the papilla can predict procedural safety and efficacy of ERCP — a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep [Internet]. 2024;1–12.
Rejeski J, Hines M, Jones J, et al. Outcomes of precut sphincterotomy techniques in cases of difficult biliary access. Frontline Gastroenterol [Internet]. 2021 Mar 1;12(2):113 LP – 117.
Sharma ZD, Puri R. Quality indicators in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a brief review of established guidelines. Clin Endosc. 2023;56(3):290–7.
Barakat MT, Girotra M, Thosani N, Kothari S, Banerjee S. Escalating complexity of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography over the last decade with increasing reliance on advanced cannulation techniques. World J Gastroenterol [Internet]. 2020 Nov 7;26(41):6391–401.
Fung BM, Pitea TC, Tabibian JH. Difficult biliary cannulation in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: Definitions, risk factors, and implications. 2021;(August):64–72.
Liu Y, Liu W, Hong J, et al. Causes and countermeasures of difficult selective biliary cannulation: A large sample size retrospective study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2021 Feb;31(5):533–8.
Cáceres-escobar D, Muñoz-velandia OM, Vargas-rubio R. Factors associated with difficult biliary cannulation in a training center for endoscopic intervention of the biliary tract. 2022;29–34.
Cheng Y, Feng J, Chen X, Lin J, Wang H. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography consultation after digestive tract reconstruction and risk factors for complications. Eur J Med Res [Internet]. 2025.
Khan D, Ullah I, Kashif M. Analysis of the effectiveness of second attempt endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) 24 hours (second day) after primary failure. Cureus. 2024;16(2):1–8.
Sheppard DP, Craddock SJ, Warner BD, Wilkinson ML. ERCP cannulation success benchmarking: implications for certification and validation. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2015 Apr;6(2):141–6.
Keswani RN, Qumseya BJ, O’Dwyer LC, Wani S. Association between endoscopist and center endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography volume with procedure success and adverse outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol [Internet]. 2017;15(12):1866-1875.e3.
Sharma ZD, Puri R. Quality indicators in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a brief review of established guidelines. Clin Endosc [Internet]. 2023 May 30;56(3):290–7.
Lee SH, Kim YS, Kim EJ, et al. Long-term outcomes of fully covered self-expandable metal stents versus plastic stents in chronic pancreatitis. Sci Rep [Internet]. 2021;11(1):1–8.
Jang S, Stevens T, Parsi MA, Bhatt A, Kichler A, Vargo JJ. Superiority of self-expandable metallic stents over plastic stents in treatment of malignant distal biliary strictures. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol [Internet]. 2022;20(2):e182–95.
Ninalowo HA, Adenigba PT, Oluyemi AO. Overcoming tight perihilar malignant biliary obstructions during percutaneous biliary intervention in Nigerian patients : case reports. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med [Internet]. 2024;
Joseph D, Muraleedharanpillai R, Kolassery S, Sebastian S. Clinical profiles and outcomes of patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in a tertiary care center. Cureus. 2024 Feb;16(2):e55065.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Tony Darmadi, Achmad Fauzi, Dadang Makmun, Hamzah Shatri, Djoa Theadora Rebecca Santoso

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright
The authors who publish in this journal agree to the following requirements:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
Privacy Statement
The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.
