Continuous Glucose Monitoring Use in Rural Area: An Evidence-Based Case Report
Keywords:
CGM, diabetes young, South Papua, Remote area, Technology adoption, continuous glucose monitoringAbstract
Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) provides real-time glycemic variability data, surpassing traditional methods like HbA1c. CGM data, also known as glucometrics, provide a comprehensive assessment of glycemic variability rather than a single point estimate like HbA1c, CGM data, or glucometrics. It provides a comprehensive assessment of glycemic variability rather than a single point estimate like HbA1c. CGM enables clinicians to understand dysglycemia patterns better by continuously tracking the patient’s glucose levels, therefore allowing for individualized adjustments to antidiabetic therapy. By continuously tracking glucose levels, a CGM enables clinicians to understand dysglycemia patterns better, allowing for individualized adjustments to antidiabetic therapy. While costly, CGM enables long-distance monitoring, addressing healthcare inaccessibility in remote rural areas. This case reportstudy examines a 24-year-old Indonesian female patient diagnosed with young-onset diabetes with limited access to specialized care, a history of macrosomia at birth, high blood glucose, and a body mass index (BMI) of 27.7. The patient's abdominal circumference was 86 cm, which is above normal for women and within the range of obesity. In this patient, CGM recorded a mean glucose level of 145 mg/dL. Studies indicate that when at least 70% of CGM data is available over a 10–14-day period, an estimated HbA1c can be calculated. CGM is vital for diabetes management in rural settings. Further, integrating telemedicine can help bridge healthcare gaps. Expanding access to CGM and genetic testing is crucial for improving outcomes in underserved communities.References
Foss R. Disparities in diabetes care: Differences between rural and urban patients within a large health system. Ann Fam Med. 2023;21:234–9.
Buzza C, et al. Distance is relative: unpacking a principal barrier in rural healthcare. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26 (Suppl 2):648–54.
Swami V. Study of glycemic variability in well-controlled type 2 diabetic patients using a continuous glucose monitoring system. J Assoc Physicians India. 2024;72:18–21.
El-Laboudi AH, Godsland IF, Johnston DG, Oliver NS. Measures of glycemic variability in type 1 diabetes and the effect of real-time continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2016;18:806–12.
Gandhi K. Insulin pump utilization in 2017-2021 for more than 22,000 children and adults with type 1 diabetes: A multicenter observational study. Clin. Diabetes. 2024;42:56–64.
Davies MJ. Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes, 2022. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetologia. 2022;65:1925–66.
Jancev M. Continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetologia. 2024;67:798–810.
Miller EM. Using continuous glucose monitoring in clinical practice. Clin Diabetes. 2020;38:429–38.
Saboo B. Time-in-range as a target in type 2 diabetes: An urgent need. Heliyon. 2021;7:e05967.
Krouwer, J.S. Adverse event causes from 2022 for four continuous glucose monitors. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025;19:80–3.
Ajjan RA. Multicenter randomized trial of intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring versus self-monitoring of blood glucose in individuals with type 2 diabetes and recent-onset acute myocardial infarction: Results of the LIBERATES trial. Diabetes Care. 2023;46:441–9.
Beck SE, Kelly C, Price DA, COACH Study Group. Non-adjunctive continuous glucose monitoring for control of hypoglycaemia (COACH): Results of a post-approval observational study. Diabet Med. 2022;39:e14739.
Manov A, Haddadin R, Chauhan S, Benge E. Retrospective, longitudinal, one-group study on the implementation of continuous glucose monitoring to improve quality of care for patients with type I or II diabetes mellitus in an internal medicine residency. Cureusontinuity community clinic. Cureus. 2024;16: e64594.
Lever CS. Extended use of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in adults with insulin-requiring type 2 diabetes: Results from the first 26 weeks of the 2GO-CGM trial. Diabet Med. 2025;42:e70025.
Davidsen L. Efficacy and safety of continuous glucose monitoring on glycaemic control in patients with chronic pancreatitis and insulin‐treated diabetes: A randomised, open‐label, crossover trial. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2025;27:3379–88.
Chehregosha H, Khamseh ME, Malek M, Hosseinpanah, F, Ismail-Beigi F. A view beyond HbA1c: Role of continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Ther. 2019;10:853–63.
Yuan Y. The association between self-monitoring of blood glucose and HbA1c in type 2 diabetes. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2023;14:1056828.
Tur-Sinai A. Health economics disparities, inequality and inequity in healthcare services: Today’s reality and tomorrow's challenges. Frontiers Media SA; 2024.
Huston-Paterson HH. Closing the distance: A qualitative study to identify equitable innovations for rural thyroid cancer treatment. Am Surg. 2024;31348241307399.
Johnston KJ, Wen H, Joynt Maddox KE. Lack of access to specialists associated with mortality and preventable hospitalizations of rural Medicare beneficiaries. Health Aff. (Millwood). 2019;38:1993–2002.
King DE. Outcomes in an interdisciplinary diabetes clinic in rural primary care. South Med J. 2019;112: 205–9.
Lingow S, Kinnikin K, Guyton J. Development of a continuous glucose monitoring service by clinical pharmacists in a medically underserved population. Inov Pharm. 2024;15:10.
Pérez K. Investigation into application of AI and telemedicine in rural communities: A systematic literature review. Healthcare (Basel). 2025;13.
Marks BE, Wolfsdorf JI. Monitoring of paediatric type 1 diabetes. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2022;34:391–9.
DiStefano M J. The cost of continuous glucose monitoring versus self-monitoring of blood glucose in type 1 diabetes pregnancies in the United States: A cost-consequences analysis using real-world evidence. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2024. doi:10.1089/dia.2024.0478.
Kim JY. Real-time continuous glucose monitoring vs. self-monitoring of blood glucose: cost-utility in South Korean type 2 diabetes patients on intensive insulin. J Med Econ. 2024;27:1245–52.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ekvan Danang Setya Pramudito, Fergie Marie Joe Grizella Runtu, Agung Anugerah, Ardy Wildan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright
The authors who publish in this journal agree to the following requirements:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
Privacy Statement
The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.
